The Standardization of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Presets on the Elekta XVI System for Optimized Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT)

Autores/as

  • Victor Augusto Bertotti Ribeiro HCFMUSP , Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo image/svg+xml , Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo image/svg+xml
    • Hélio Yoriyaz Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares image/svg+xml

      DOI:

      https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2026.3027

      Palabras clave:

      Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), Elekta XVI, image quality optimization, dose reduction, IGRT standardization

      Resumen

      Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) relies on accurate imaging systems to ensure precise patient positioning and target localization. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) integrated into the Elekta XVI platform enables volumetric imaging with soft-tissue visualization, but image quality and patient dose strongly depend on acquisition parameters, or “presets.” This study presents a comprehensive methodology for standardizing CBCT presets on the Elekta XVI system to optimize image quality, geometric accuracy, and radiation dose according to the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle. Eighteen acquisition configurations were systematically evaluated by varying tube potential, tube current, exposure time, filtration, collimation, gantry speed, and projection number. Radiation dose was measured using a calibrated ionization chamber, while image quality was assessed through Catphan 503 phantom analysis using the PyLinac software, quantifying uniformity, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), spatial resolution (MTF), and geometric accuracy. Results showed that tube potential (kV) was the dominant factor influencing image uniformity (ρ = 0.674, p = 0.0229) and contrast (ρ = 0.676, p = 0.0225), while dose scaled linearly with tube current and exposure time. Bow-tie filtration (F1) reduced central dose by approximately 25% and improved CNR. Geometric accuracy remained within ±1 mm for all protocols. Based on these quantitative relationships, standardized clinical presets were established for distinct anatomical sites (Head and Neck, Chest, Prostate and Pelvis), combining higher tube potential with reduced mAs to balance photon penetration, image contrast, acquisition time, and dose efficiency. The resulting protocols ensure reproducible image quality, and minimized patient exposure. This framework demonstrates that data-driven standardization of CBCT presets enhances both safety and precision in daily IGRT practice and provides a foundation for future adaptive radiotherapy integration.

      Descargas

      Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

      Referencias

      [1] DING, G. X.; ALAEI, P.; CURRAN, B.; FLYNN, R.; GOSSMAN, M.; MACKIE, T. R.; MIFTEN, M.; MORIN, R.; XU, X.; ZHU, T. C. Image guidance doses delivered during radiotherapy: Quantification, management, and reduction: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group 180. Medical Physics, Alexandria, VA: American Association of Physicists in Medicine, v. 45, n. 5, p. e1121–e1146, 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12824

      [2] BISSONNETTE, J.-P.; BALTER, P. A.; DONG, L.; LANGEN, K. M.; LOVEOCK, D. M.; MIFTEN, M.; MOSELEY, D. J.; POULIOT, J.; SONKE, J.-J.; YOO, S. Quality assurance for image-guided radiation therapy utilizing CT-based technologies: A report of the AAPM TG-179. Medical Physics, Alexandria, VA: American Association of Physicists in Medicine, v. 39, n. 4, p. 1741–1763, 2012. DOI: 10.1118/1.3690466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3690466

      [3] OLIVEIRA, J.B.; NERSISSIAN, D.Y.; YOSHIMURA, E.M. Tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico (CBCT) em radioterapia guiada por imagem (IGRT): dosimetria e qualidade de imagem [Internet]. São Paulo: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; 2021 [cited 2025 Nov 7]. Trabalho de conclusão de curso (Residência em Medicina).

      [4] KERNS, J.R. Pylinac: Image analysis for routine quality assurance in radiotherapy [Internet]. Version 3.39.0. 2023 [cited 2025 Nov 07]. Available from: https://pylinac.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

      [5] The Phantom Laboratory, Inc. Catphan® 503 Manual. Greenwich, NY: The Phantom Laboratory, Inc.; 2017

      [6] DOWNES, P.; JARVIS, R.; RADU, E.; KAWRAKOW, I.; SPEZI, E. Monte Carlo simulation and patient dosimetry for a kilovoltage cone-beam CT unit. Medical Physics. 2009 Sep;36(9):4156-4167. doi:10.1118/1.3196182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3196182

      [7] AL-KABKABI, A.; RAMACHANDRAN, P.; AAMRY, A.; TAMAM, N.; ABUHADI, N. H.; JOHARY, Y.; AAMRI, H.; SULIEMAN, A.; TRAPP, J. Assessment of cone beam computed tomography image quality and dose for commonly used pre-sets in external beam radiotherapy. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2022; 199:110287. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110287

      [8] WILSON, L. J.; HADJIPANTELI, A.; ØSTERGAARD, D. E.; BOGAERT, E.; BROWN, K. F.; DEJONG, R.; EARLEY, J.; EDOUARD, M.; KHAN, M.; LINDSAY, J.; VAN DER HIMST, J.; DING, G. X.; WOOD, T.; AZNAR, M. C.; JORNET, N.; NTENTAS, G. ET AL. (2025). Cone Beam CT Dose Optimisation: A Review and Expert Consensus by the 2022 ESTRO Physics Workshop IGRT Working Group. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 209, Article 110958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110958 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110958

      [9] KAMATH S.; SONG W.; CHVETSOV A.; OZAWA S.; LU H.; SAMANT S.; LIU C.; LI J.G.; PALTA J.R. An image quality comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2011 Feb 4;12(2):376-390. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3435

      Descargas

      Publicado

      2026-05-15

      Número

      Sección

      Original Articles