Pressure Vessels Structural Integrity Assessment Using Failure Analysis Diagrams

Juarez de Jesus Rocha Pinto; Miguel Mattar Neto

doi:10.15392/2319-0612.2025.2781

Authors

Juarez de Jesus Rocha Pinto Navy Technological Center in São Paulo - 18560-000, Iperó, SP, Brazil
Miguel Mattar Neto Institute of Energy and Nuclear Research - 05508-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2025.2781

Keywords:

failure assessment diagram, fitness-for-service, BS-7910, API-579, crack, pressure vessel, R6

Abstract

There is much discussion today about the possibility of extending the lifetime of industrial plant components due to economic factors. Pressure vessels are among the most expensive components, and their replacement can significantly impact the operation of an entire plant. In this context, several Fitness-for-Service (FFS) methodologies can be applied to assess structural integrity, addressing not only economic aspects but also enhancing safety. Failure Assessment Diagrams (FADs) are widely used in FFS methodologies to prevent future failures by analyzing crack-type defects. These diagrams establish acceptability criteria based on the material toughness ratio and loading ratio. Recommended practices utilizing the BS-7910, API-579, and R6 methodologies are addressed in this work, alongside principles from fracture mechanics, material properties, and solid mechanics. The main objective was to develop computer programs in Matlab to analyze a case study involving a pressure vessel manufactured from SA-516 Gr 70 steel, determining the critical dimensions of semi-elliptical cracks in longitudinal and circumferential orientations of a cylindrical section. Level 2 evaluation, the most commonly used in FFS methodologies, was applied to develop the programs. This study enabled the creation of tools to automate calculations and generate FAD graphs, considering the critical depth and length of cracks. These tools support decision-making in structural design requirements and provide a means of evaluating equipment in service with crack-type defects, extending its operational lifetime. The FFS methodologies studied are based on ASME Codes for pressure vessels and piping, particularly Sections III and XI. Based on the analysis of API-579, BS-7910, and R6 methodologies under the operating conditions of the case study, it is possible to conclude that, for normal evaluations, critical length (2c) = 40.64 mm and critical depth (a) = 10.16 mm are acceptable values. However, for evaluations requiring safety considerations under the R6 procedure, applicable to Class A service equipment in the nuclear sector, only critical length (l) = 5 mm and depth (a) = 2.5 mm are permissible values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUITION- BSI - BS7910:2005 - Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. London, 2005.

[2] API 579-1/ASME FFS-1:2016 - Fitness-For-Service. “American Society of Mechanical Engineers”, New York, USA, 2016.

[3] DILLSTRÖM, P., GUNNARS, J., VONUNGE, P., MÅNGÅRD, D., Procedure for safety assessment of components with defects 2018:18 – Handbook Edition 5, Kiwa Inspecta Technology AB, Stockholm, Available at: www.stralsakerhetsmyndigheten.se.

[4] R6:2015, Assessment of the Integrity of Structures Containing Defects, R6 –Revision 4, Up to amendment record No.11, EDF Energy Nuclear Generation Ltd.

[5] ASME Code Section III, Division 1 - Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components, New York, NY, USA July, 2010.

[6] MEDINA, J. A. H., Evaluation of elastoplastic fracture predictions, PhD thesis PUC, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, 2014.

[7] MATTAR NETO M., CRUZ J.R.B., DE JONG R.P., Influence of the materials mechanical properties on the structural integrity assessment of cracked piping of PWR nuclear reactors primary systems, Progress in Nuclear Energy 50, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.08.006

[8] ASME Code Section VIII Division 1 - Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code - Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels, New York, NY, USA July, 2010.

[9] ASME Code Section VIII Division 2 - Boiler and Pressure Vessel - Alternative Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels, New York, NY, USA July, 2010.

[10] KUMAR, N.,ALSABBAGH, A., SEOK, C.S., MURTY, K.L., Synergistic Effects of Neutron Irradiation and Interstitial Nitrogen on Strain Aging in Ferritic Steels, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51097-2_12

[11] BSI PD 5500 - Specification for Unfired Fusion Welded Pressure Vessels, Fourth edition, UK, Jan 2009.

[12] ANDERSON, T.L., Fracture Mechanics – Fundamentals and Applications, 4ª Edition, CRC Press, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370293

[13] SEOK, C., Effect of temperature on the fracture toughness of SA-516 GR70 steel, KSME international journal Vol. 14, N° 1,pp. 11 a 18, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03184766

[14] ZICK, L. P., Stress Horizontal Cylindrical Pressure Vessels on Two Saddle Supports, published in The Welding Journal Research Supplement, 1951.

[15] MANESCHY, J. E., MIRANDA, C. A. J., Fracture Mechanics in the Nuclear Industry, Eletrobrás, Eletronuclear, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, 2014.

[16] ASME Code Section XI - Boiler and Pressure Vessel - Rules for in Service Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components, New York, NY - USA, 2010.

[17] TINOCO, E., PATRÍCIO, N., FREIRE, P. S., Design and Stress Analysis Codes for Pressure Vessels, PETROBRAS.

[18] DSEED ENGINEERING, Data-Book Handbook, Sorocaba-SP, 2011.

[19] MIRANDA, C. A. J., Thesis presented to IPEN, Obtaining the Cleavage Stress and Reliability Level in Determining the Reference Temperature Transition of Ferritic Steels: Numerical and Experimental Approach, São Paulo, 1989.

[20] AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING MATERIALS - ASTM A516 Carbon Steel, Grade 70.

[21] MATTAR NETO M. An approach to defining criteria, codes and standards for the mechanical and structural design of nuclear power plant components, IPEN-CNEN, São Paulo-SP.

[22] JASKE, CARL E.,KOCH, G. H., Failure and Damage Mechanisms - Embrittlement, Corrosion, Fatigue and Creep, Cortest Columbus Technologies, Inc, Columbus, Ohio.

[23] TWI Software. Crackwise 5 help content version 5.0 27934 Final, 2016.

[24] ASME Code Section II - Boiler and Pressure Vessel – Part D – Properties - Materials, New York, NY, USA July, 2010.