Radiological Protection Management: software implementation in a hospital in south Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2471Keywords:
Health Management, Radiological Protection, Health Informatics, technology, Radiological TechnologyAbstract
The exacerbated increase in the use of ionizing radiation to obtain images, and the risks and standards that exist to preserve the health of those who use it, are not properly taken into account when carrying out radiodiagnostic examinations. The professionals who work in these environments play a decisive role in the performance of their numerous activities within radiodiagnostic services, bearing in mind that any dose of radiation is associated with a probability of biological effects occurring, no matter how low that dose may be. Thus, the aim of building a software program was to optimize the work of the multiprofessional and interdisciplinary team in radiodiagnostic services, in the management of radiological protection. This is a methodological and quasi-experimental study carried out in a university hospital in southern Brazil, intentionally chosen because it has a Radiological Protection Committee. This research design was adopted for the development of technological production, in this case software for managing radiological protection. The study was carried out in the radiological protection sector of the radiology department of a university hospital in southern Brazil. The results showed that the software, called SisPRad - Management System for Radiological Protection, is a tool that helps the service's multi-professional and interdisciplinary team in terms of managing radiological protection. Finally, it aims to ensure the safety of professionals working in the service and its users, as well as reducing repetition of activities at management level, and can be adapted for other institutions. The computer registration number 512019002125-8 was obtained from the National Institute of Industrial Property for the first version of the software and the registration number 512023003116-0 for its second version.
Downloads
References
ANKER, J. S. et al. Guidance for publishing qualitative research in informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, v. 28, n. 12, p. 2743-2748, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab195
BANGOR, A.; KORTUM, P.; MILLER, J. Determining What individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, v. 4, n. 3, 2009.
BABARNUM, C. et al. The "magic number 5": is it enough for web testing? April 2003 CHI 2003: NEW HORIZONS p. 698-699, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.765936
BROOKE, J. SUS: A 'quick and dirty' usability scale. In: JORDAN, P. W.; THOMAS, B.; BERNARD, A. ([abbr. Contributor’s Role as applicable]). Usability evaluation in industry. Chicago: : Taylor & Francis, 1996. p. 189-194.
CAMPBELL, F. D.; STANLEY J. C. Experimental and quasi-experiment al designs for research. Chicago: Rand Mcanally & Company, 1963. Available at: https://moodle2.units.it/pluginfile.php/132646/mod_resource/content/1/Estratto_Sh adis hCookCampbellExperimental2002.pdf. Accessed on: September 27, 2023.
DAVIS, F. D. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. 1985. Thesis (Doctorate in Management) - Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1985.
HAJESMAEEL-GOHARI, S. et al. The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, v. 22, n. 22, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2
HUHN, A. et al. SisPRad: software for radiological protection management in a hospital environment. Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem, v. 30, p. 1-15, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2020-0161
HUHN, Andréa et al. Implementation of the radiological protection program: view of the health team working in a radiology service. Texto contexto - enferm., Florianópolis, v. 26, n. 1, Epub Mar 27, 2017. e5370015. Available at:. Accessed on: Mar. 20, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072017005370015
LARAVEL. Contribution guide. 2023. Available at: https://laravel.com/docs/8.x/contributions#coding-style-guide.
MAXQDA. VERBI Software. 2020 [computer software]. Berlin, Germany: VERBI Software, 2019. Available at: https://www.maxqda.com/pt/software-analise-qualitativa. Accessed on: October 5, 2023.
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/