Polymer-based shielding approaches as a practical solution reducing radiological risks in field operations

Authors

  • Lucas Rodrigues Military Institute of Engineering
  • Claudio Antonio Federico Institute for Advanced Studies
  • Tercio Brum Military Institute of Engineering
  • Sergio Gavazza Military Institute of Engineering
  • Jéssica de Moutta Gomes Iguaçu University
  • Edson Ramos de Andrade Military Institute of Engineering / Institute for Advanced Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2460

Keywords:

polymeric materials, radiation shielding, radiological risk

Abstract

The objective of this research is to evaluate various polymeric materials that have the potential to serve as substitutes or supplements to heavy vehicle structures for radiation-intensive environments. The materials under investigation include Nylon 6 (PA-6, C6H11NO), polyethylene (PE, C2H4), polypropylene (PP, C3H6), polyvinyl chloride (PVC, C2H3Cl), and polymethylacrylate (PMMA, C5H8O2). This study's primary aim is to determine each material's effectiveness in shielding against radiation and reducing exposure to vehicle occupants. As a new approach, this research examines the impact of utilizing polymeric materials and the potential health hazards for young drivers of both sexes, such as developing solid cancers from radiation exposure. According to the study, PVC was the most efficient polymer with a Transmission Factor (TF) of 0.44, leading to a 56% decrease in the relative risk estimate for the maximum thickness evaluated (20 cm). On the other hand, PP was identified as the least efficient, with a TF of 0.65, resulting in a 35% reduction in the relative risk estimate for the same thickness. The study concludes that each polymer has varying degrees of attenuation and that combining their properties is essential to achieving the desired level of risk reduction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

More, C. V., Alsayed, Z., Badawi, M. S., Thabet, A. A. and Pawar, P. P., Environmental Chemistry Letters. 19, 2057-2090 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01189-9

Abd El-Hameed, A. M., NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics. 11, 313-324 (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20909977.2022.2079902

Alves, D. F., Stenders, R. M., Federico, C. A. and Andrade, E. R., Journal of Radiological Protection. 42, 031519 (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac9395

Almurayshid, M., Alsagabi, S., Alssalim, Y., Alotaibi, Z. and Almsalam, R., Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 183, 109425 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109425

Johansen, G. A. (2015). 7 - Gamma-ray tomography, (Woodhead Publishing, pp. 197-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-118-4.00007-1

Harima, Y., Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 41, 631-672 (1993). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-806X(93)90317-N

Harima, Y., Sakamoto, Y., Tanaka, S. and Kawai, M., Nuclear Science and Engineering. 94, 24-35 (1986). DOI: https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE86-A17113

Singh, V. P. and Badiger, N. M., Radioprotection. 48, 511-526 (2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2013066

Chilton, A. B., Shultis, J. K. and Faw, R. E. (1984). Principles of Radiation Shielding, Prentice-Hall.

Committee, A. N. S. S. (1991). Gamma-ray Attenuation Coefficients and Buildup Factors for Engineering Materials, (American Nuclear Society).

IAEA (1996). IAEA-TECDOC-870 - Methods for Estimating the Probability of Cancer from Occupational Radiation Exposure, (International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna).

Conklin, James & Walker, Richard. (2009). Military Radiobiology. International Journal of Radiation Biology, INT J RADIAT BIOL. 52. 407.

CNEN (2024) - Norma CNEN-NN 3.01 - Requisitos Básicos de Radioproteção e Segurança Radiológica de Fontes de Radiação, Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear, Rio de Janeiro.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Polymer-based shielding approaches as a practical solution reducing radiological risks in field operations. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, v. 12, n. 2, p. e2460, 2024. DOI: 10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2460. Disponível em: https://www.bjrs.org.br/revista/index.php/REVISTA/article/view/2460. Acesso em: 2 may. 2025.