Analysis of the relationship between field size and change in radiation dose to patient and staff based on radiographic technique in fluoroscopy and radiography

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2455

Keywords:

fluoroscopy, radiography, radiation dose, field size

Abstract

In discussions of radiological protection issues in fluoroscopy and radiography the radiation field size is usually mentioned in connection with unnecessary irradiation of the patient’s body parts that do not need to be imaged. However, excessive expansion of the field size leads also to some other effects: the excessive irradiation of assistants and visualized part of patient's body as well as the change in dose rate at the entrance of patient’s body by automatic brightness control. The aim of the present paper is to describe the results of an experimental study of the dependence of such effects on irradiation field size and primary X-ray spectrum. The measurements were carried out in conditions close to those of barium meal test. To simulate the patient body, 5 acrylic plates measuring 30 cm high x 30 cm long x 3 cm thick each were used, totalling 15 cm thick. The X2 RF Sensor (RAYSAFE) was used to measure the dose rate at the entrance and exit surface of the simulator and the specific model for measuring leakage and dispersion, the X2 Survey sensor (RAYSAFE), was used to measure the occupational dose rate. The occupational dose rate detector was located at the position that assistant usually maintains to support the patient's head and/or to administer the contrast. The results show that in radiographic mode dose rate at the exit of the patient’s body increases with the increase of field size. This increase reaches 85%. The increase of occupational dose rate in radiographic mode reaches 850% and is linearly proportional to the field area. In fluoroscopic mode, dose rate at the entrance of the patient’s body decreases proportionally to the increase of field side length because of the automatic brightness control. This effect reaches 25% with grid and 50% without grid.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images in Paediatrics. EUR 16261, ECSC-EC-EAEC, Brussels, Luxembourg, 1996. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/47eb62b0-698d-4166-bc34-cc3f8d07d2e3

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. European Guidelines on Diagnostic Reference Levels for Paediatric Imaging. Radiation Protection N°185, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6e473ff5-bd4b-11e8-99ee-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

International Atomic Energy Agency. Patient Dose Optimization in Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures. IAEA-TECDOC-1641, IAEA, Vienna, 2010. Available at: https://www.iaea.org/publications/8176/patient-dose-optimization-in-fluoroscopically-guided-interventional-procedures

International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiological protection in cardiology. ICRP Publication 120. Ann. ICRP, v. 42, n. 1, 2013. Available at: https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%20120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2012.09.001

International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology. ICRP Publication 121. Ann. ICRP, v. 42, n. 2, 2013. Available at: https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%20121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2012.10.001

International Commission on Radiological Protection. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. ICRP Publication 135. Ann. ICRP, v. 46, n. 1, 2017. Available at: https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%20135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645317717209

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2020/2021 Report, United Nations, New York, 2022. Available at: https://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2020_2021_1.html

QUINN B. CARROLL. Radiography in the digital age: Physics Exposure Radiation Biology. 2600 South First Street, Springfield, Illinois 62704: Charles C Thomas Publisher, LTD, 2018. ISBN 978-0-398-09215-3.

NUNES, G. S.; JAKUBIAK, R.R.; DORO, R.B.; SETTI, J.A.P.; DENYAK, V. Occupational Dose in Pediatric Seriography of the Esophagus, Stomach and Duodene. Rev. Bras. Fís. Méd., v. 16:572, p. 1-5, 2022. Available at: https://www.rbfm.org.br/rbfm/article/view/572/599 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2022.v16.19849001572

NUNES, G. S.; DORO, R.B.; JAKUBIAK, R.R.; SETTI, J.A.P.; BARROS, F.S.; DENYAK, V. Occupational Dose in Pediatric Barium Meal Examinations, IFMBE Proceedings, v. 83, p. 1051-1054, 2022. Available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_156

RaySafe. RaySafe X2 Specifications. Disponível em: https://www.raysafe.com/sites/default/files/2021-07/raysafe_x2_specification_brochure.pdf. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2023.

Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Radiodiagnóstico Médico: Desempenho de Equipamentos e Segurança. Brasilia, Editora Anvisa, 2005. p. 1-104.

PORTO, L.; LUNELLI, N.; PASCHUK, S.; OLIVEIRA, FERREIRA, J.L.; SCHELIN, H.; MIGUEL, C.; DENYAK, V.; KMIECIK, C.; TILLY, J.; KHOURY, H.; Evaluation of entrance surface air kerma in pediatric chest radiography, Rad. Phys. Chem., v. 104, p. 252-259, 2014. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0969806X14000590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.02.014

Downloads

Published

2024-08-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Analysis of the relationship between field size and change in radiation dose to patient and staff based on radiographic technique in fluoroscopy and radiography. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, v. 12, n. 3, p. e2455, 2024. DOI: 10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2455. Disponível em: https://www.bjrs.org.br/revista/index.php/REVISTA/article/view/2455. Acesso em: 2 may. 2025.