Characterization of the response of a well chamber to different models of Ir-192 sources for HDR brachytherapy

Alexandre Bernardino; Izabella Souza; Thais Hauradou; Ademir Da Silva; Inayá Lima

doi:10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2436

Authors

Alexandre Bernardino Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Izabella Souza Federal University of Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1740-2797
Thais Hauradou Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Ademir Da Silva Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Inayá Lima Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2436

Keywords:

HDR brachytherapy, Monte Carlo method, Ir-192 sources

Abstract

The determination of the reference air kerma rate (K_R) with well chambers calibrated using a different model of source than desired can lead to significant errors, affecting both radiological traceability institutions and healthcare facilities. This study employs the methodology proposed by SHIPLEY et al. (2015) with the PTW T33005 well chamber model and six models of HDR brachytherapy sources (microSelectron v.1; microSelectron v.2; Flexisource; GammaMed Plus; BEBIG GI192M11; Varisource VS2000) to derive correction factors for source geometry (K_SG). These factors adjust the chamber calibration factor for air kerma (N_K) to the source model under measurement. The methodology relies on simulating the chamber response to sources using the Monte Carlo Method (MC), specifically utilizing the MCNPX code. Both the source and well chamber models were validated by comparing dosimetric parameters from TG-43 and simulated calibration factors (^MCN_K) with literature-derived reference values. The normalized K_SG values, relative to the microSelectron v.1 source, agree with reference values, demonstrating the methodology's applicability across various chamber models, sources, and MC codes. The corrections ranged from 0.984 to 1.001, with the most significant correction observed for the Varisource VS2000 source, yielding K_SG = 0.984, corresponding to a -1.6% correction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Alves, “INCA lança a Estimativa 2023 – Incidência de Câncer no Brasil | Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde MS”. Acesso em: 25 de setembro de 2024. [Online]. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/inca-lanca-a-estimativa-2023-incidencia-de-cancer-no-brasil/

A. G. Gouveia et al., “System-Level Capacity of High-Dose Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy for Management of Cervical Cancer in an Upper-Middle Income Country: A Case Study From Brazil”, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, vol. 114, no 3, p. 545–553, nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.074

H. Murshed, Fundamentals of Radiation Oncology: Physical, Biological, and Clinical Aspects. Academic Press, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814128-1.00003-9

ICRU, Dose and volume specification for reporting interstitial therapy. ICRU Publ., 1997.

S. J. Goetsch, F. H. Attix, L. A. Dewerd, e B. R. Thomadsen, “A new re-entrant ionization chamber for the calibration of iridium-192 high dose rate sources”, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, vol. 24, no 1, Art. no 1, jan. 1992, doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(92)91037-N. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(92)91037-N

A. Schüller, M. Meier, H.-J. Selbach, e U. Ankerhold, “A radiation quality correction factor kQ for well-type ionization chambers for the measurement of the reference air kerma rate of 60Co HDR brachytherapy sources”, Medical Physics, vol. 42, no 7, Art. no 7, 2015, doi: 10.1118/1.4922684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4922684

C. G. Soares, G. Douysset, e M. G. Mitch, “Primary standards and dosimetry protocols for brachytherapy sources”, Metrologia, vol. 46, no 2, Art. no 2, mar. 2009, doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/46/2/S06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/46/2/S06

ICRU, “Report 24: determination of absorbed dose in a patient irradiated by beams of X or gamma rays in radiotherapy procedures”. 1976.

R. Nath, L. L. Anderson, G. Luxton, K. A. Weaver, J. F. Williamson, e A. S. Meigooni, “Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: recommendations of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 43”, Medical physics, vol. 22, no 2, Art. no 2, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597458

D. R. Shipley, T. Sander, e R. F. Nutbrown, “Source geometry factors for HDR 192Ir brachytherapy secondary standard well-type ionization chamber calibrations”, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 60, no 6, Art. no 6, mar. 2015, doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/6/2573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/60/6/2573

J. F. Williamson e Z. Li, “Monte Carlo aided dosimetry of the microselectron pulsed and high dose-rate 192Ir sources”, Medical Physics, vol. 22, no 6, p. 809–819, 1995, doi: 10.1118/1.597483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597483

G. M. Daskalov, E. Löffler, e J. F. Williamson, “Monte Carlo-aided dosimetry of a new high dose-rate brachytherapy source”, Medical Physics, vol. 25, no 11, p. 2200–2208, 1998, doi: 10.1118/1.598418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598418

D. Granero, J. Pérez-Calatayud, E. Casal, F. Ballester, e J. Venselaar, “A dosimetric study on the high dose rate Flexisource”, Medical Physics, vol. 33, no 12, p. 4578–4582, 2006, doi: 10.1118/1.2388154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2388154

F. Ballester et al., “Technical note: Monte-Carlo dosimetry of the HDR 12i and Plus sources”, Medical Physics, vol. 28, no 12, p. 2586–2591, 2001, doi: 10.1118/1.1420398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1420398

D. Granero, J. Pérez-Calatayud, e F. Ballester, “Monte Carlo calculation of the TG-43 dosimetric parameters of a new BEBIG Ir-192 HDR source”, Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 76, no 1, p. 79–85, jul. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.016

A. Angelopoulos, P. Baras, L. Sakelliou, P. Karaiskos, e P. Sandilos, “Monte Carlo dosimetry of a new high dose rate brachytherapy source”, Medical Physics, vol. 27, no 11, p. 2521–2527, 2000, doi: 10.1118/1.1315316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1315316