Analysis of exposure indices from digital radiography exams
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2435Keywords:
Radiography, exposure index, radiation exposureAbstract
Radiography is a crucial diagnostic imaging modality in clinical practice, with persistent challenges in digital radiography regarding the level of exposure. The International Electrotechnical Commission standardized the Exposure Index (EI) and Deviation Index (DI) in digital systems, aiming to improve the assessment of radiation exposure. Each exam has an associated Target Exposure Index (EIT), representing the balance between radiation dose and image quality. This study analyzed the EI and DI of digital radiographs at a university hospital, using a database of 71,760 radiographs. The analysis considered the action limits as suggested by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). The group of exposures carried out in radiography rooms presented a DI of 1.2, while that of exposures carried out on mobile equipment, 2.4. In contrast, the first group presented standard deviation values between 1.5 and 3.9, while the second, between 1.8 and 2.6. These results suggest that exposures performed using Automatic Exposure Control (CAE) differ less from EIT, however, radiographic techniques were more standardized among exams with mobile equipment, performed with manual selection of exposure parameters, as these exams presented a smaller DI dispersion range. The creation of an automated tool in Google Looker Studio facilitated interactive data analysis, presenting information by anatomical region and view, with the potential to continuously monitor radiological practices. For certain incidences, the average DI values obtained differed substantially from the ideal value, which requires optimization actions, investigation into the definition of adequate EIT and calibration of the CAE. The study provided a detailed overview of local radiographic practices, highlighting priorities for optimization and standardization actions.
Downloads
References
MOTHIRAM, Ursula et al. Digital radiography exposure indices: A review. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences 61 (2014) 112– 118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.49
BUSHBERG, Jerrold T. et al. The essential physics of medical imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2012.6
SEERAM, Euclid. The New Exposure Indicator for Digital Radiography. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences - Volume 45, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 144-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2014.02.004
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICISTS IN MEDICINE. An Exposure Indicator for Digital Radiography, Report of AAPM Task Group 116. College Park, MD: AAPM; 2009.
RASBAND, INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION. Medical electrical equipment – Exposure index of digital x-ray imaging systems – Part 1: Definitions and requirements for general radiography. IEC 62494-1. ed. 1.0, Geneva, 2008.
SEIBERT J.A., MORIN R.L. The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: An opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population. Pediatr. Radiol. 2011; 41:573–581. doi: 10.1007/s00247-010-1954-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1954-6
CREEDEN A., CURTIS M. Optimising default radiographic exposure factors using Deviation Index. Radiography (Lond). 2020 Nov;26(4):308-313. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.02.009.18 Mar 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.02.009
COMUNICAÇÃO SPR. Latin Safe (set/20) - O que é Índice de Exposição e Sua Importância em Radioproteção [online video]. YouTube, 29 de set. de 2020. Available in: https://youtu.be/Pw2oYzssya8?si=k5-nbq_zzsbmYJU3. Accessed in: December 2023.
DAVE J.K., JONES A.K., FISHER R, et al. Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232. Med Phys. 2018;45(11):e1146-e1160. doi:10.1002/mp.13212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13212
LEWIS S., PIETERSE T., LAWRENCE H. Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography. J Med Radiat Sci 2019;66(1):38e43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.317
SEFM; SEPR; SERAM. Protocolo Español de Control de Calidad en Radiodiagnóstico: Revisión 2011. 3. ed. rev. Madrid: Senda Editorial, S.A., 2012. 326 p.
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICISTS IN MEDICINE. Task Group No. 368 - Methodology for Establishing Exam-Specific Target Exposure Indices in General Radiography (TG368). 2021. Available in: https://www.aapm.org/org/structure/default.asp?committee_code=TG368. Accessed in: November 2023.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/