The implementation process of knowledge management at the Institute of Radiation Protection and Dosimetry: actions and perspectives

.


INTRODUCTION
The Institute of Radiation Protection and Dosimetry (IRD) is a research and development institute, being considered a national and international reference center in the area. Linked to the Brazilian Nuclear Energy Commission (CNEN), the IRD works in collaboration with universities, government agencies and industry to promote the safe use of ionizing radiation and nuclear technology [1].
The IRD has a tradition in the training of human resources through its Postgraduate Educational In addition to these activities, IRD offers regular short-term courses and trainings, and is also responsible in the country for maintain, develop and disseminate national standards of radioactive sources and prepare personnel, in an integrated manner, to respond, at national and international level, to possible radiological emergencies [2].
Despite its relevance, the IRD has suffered in recent years a loss of its specialized intellectual capital, either due to the high number of retirements the lack of replacement of qualified personnel, which can compromise the execution of a large number of activities.
To mitigate this loss of critical institutional knowledge, the IRD Board has supported a series of initiatives in view of the importance of preserving the technical-scientific knowledge related to its activities. And one of these initiatives was the implementation process of the Knowledge Management (KM), once KM has the potential to generate several benefits in public and private organizations, such as achieving objectives, increasing innovation and competitiveness, generating, retaining and disseminating knowledge [3].
It is essential then to carry out processes that involve education, qualification and training of human resources, always aiming at the transfer of knowledge [4]. The understanding of KM must be that according to which strategic information is identified, analyzed and interpreted in order to generate new information and knowledge that support the decision-making and action processes [5][6][7].
Thus, Nuclear Knowledge Management (NKM) is extremely important for the development and preservation of the knowledge and skills necessary for the execution of activities related to the nuclear area. In this regard, for the IAEA, the importance of the NKM would be that building, collecting, transferring, sharing, preserving, maintaining and using knowledge is essential to develop and maintain the necessary technical knowledge and skills required for nuclear power programs and other nuclear technologies, as advanced and specialized knowledge in nuclear engineering and science is essential for the safe and effective design, construction, licensing, commissioning, operation, maintenance and decommissioning of nuclear technology-based systems, which have long life cycles [8; 9]. Therefore, recognizing the importance of NKM, the IAEA develops methodologies and guidance documents to plan, design and implement NKM programs and facilitate nuclear education, providing support, networking opportunities and exchange of experiences [8; 9].
The IAEA assists Member States by providing products and services to maintain and preserve nuclear knowledge and by promoting the use of state-of-the-art knowledge management technologies, as in the case of radiation protection, a set of measures designed to protect human beings, their descendants and the environment against possible undue effects caused by ionizing radiation from technologically modified natural sources and sources [8; 9].

MATERIALS AND METHODS
This paper aims to carry out an experience report [10] of the NKM implementation process in a nuclear public organization unit (IRD), describing the steps and assets (products and results), as well as pointing out future activities. Thus, a brief history will be carried out, demonstrating its stages and some of its products and results.
The implementation of NKM at IRD followed the precepts contained in the "IAEA-TECDOC-1675", entitled "Knowledge Management for Nuclear Research and Development Organizations" [11], using its definitions, guidelines, methods and models. In this TEC-DOC-1675, can be found information about some KM methodologies as: Management Strategy ("Up/Down"; "Push/Pull");

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The IRD has developed institutionally a series of actions aimed at implementing the NKM, as will be shown chronologically below.

First steps -NKM School
The beginning of awareness and the first technical contact in NKM by the staff of the IRD

Ph.D.
In 2015, a doctoral thesis entitled "Sociotechnical modeling of a nuclear organization: a case study applied to the National Laboratory of Metrology of Ionizing Radiation" [13] was defended by the employee of the IRD Maria Elizabeth Dias Acar, in the Postgraduate Program in Nuclear Technology from the Institute for Energy and Nuclear Research (IPEN).
In this thesis, a methodology combining process mapping and analysis; knowledge elicitation mapping and critical analysis; and sociotechnical analysis based on social network analysis was conceived. The methodology was applied to the National Laboratory of Ionizing Radiation Metrology (LNMRI), a small knowledge intensive organization, and has allowed the appraisal of the main intellectual assets and their ability to evolve. In this sense, based on real issues such as attrition, the impacts of probable future scenarios were assessed. For such task, a multimodal network of processes, knowledge objects and people were analyzed using a set of appropriate metrics and means, including sphere of influence of key nodes [13].
To differentiate the ability of people playing roles in the processes, some nodes attributes were used to provide partition criteria for the network and thus the ability to differentiate the impact of potential loss of supervisors and operators. The proposed methodology has allowed for: i) the identification of knowledge objects and their sources; ii) mapping and ranking of these objects according to their relevance and iii) the assessment of vulnerabilities in LNMRIs network structure and iv) revealing of informal mechanisms of knowledge sharing. The conceived methodological framework has proved to be a robust tool for a broad diagnosis to support succession planning and also the organizational strategic planning [13].

Awareness Process-The 1st Brazilian School of NKM
The IRD, in partnership with the IAEA, promoted the 1st Brazilian School of NKM, between December 5 and 9, 2016. The objective was to provide specialized training for professionals who have or can play a leading role in the development and implementation of knowledge management programs in nuclear science and technology organizations [14].
Held at the IRD headquarters in Rio de Janeiro, the School brought together 48 professionals from various institutions in the nuclear sector, universities and companies, after a selection of 150 applicants [14].
The training, entirely free of charge, was given by experts from the country and abroad invited by the IAEA. The students learned about available KM tools, discussed knowledge loss risk analysis and knowledge transfer and inter-organizational networks, among other topics. They also had the opportunity to assemble mini-projects in groups, based on real scenarios [14].

Creation of the Knowledge Management Working Group (KM-IRD)
In 2019, Ordinance IRD nº 30, of April 15, was edited, instituting the group aimed at creating a KM project (KM-IRD) aimed at retaining, preserving and transferring knowledge within the scope of the IRD, using as based on the precepts of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Currently, the KM-IRD is composed of 5 employees:  1 from Information Technology (IT) area;  1 from Human Resources (HR) area;  1 from Teaching and Training area;  1 from Management area;  1 from Finalistic/Techincal area.

Mapping the Critical Knowledge of IRD
The CNEN and its respective institutes, such as the IRD, have been facing, over the years, a reduction in the number of employees, causing a significant loss of institutional knowledge. This is mainly due to the aging of the workforce (due to retirement), the departure of employees to work in other areas and the lack of public tenders ( Figure 1).

IRD Workforce Employees Outsources Students and Felowships
It can be mentioned that, in 2022, there were 179 permanent employees linked to the IRD (in addition to 94 service providers and 110 studentsboth cases of temporary employees). Of this total of 179, 100 were already eligible for retirement. In addition, the IRD presented, in the year 2022, an average age among its effective employees of 57 years (Figure 2). To map the critical knowledge of retired IRD employees, the model used by the IAEA (2006) [15] was used as a basis, which has the advantage of immediately identifying where there is a greater risk of losing critical knowledge. In this model, the so-called Dropout and Position Risk Factors are considered.
The Dropout Risk Factor is based on the employee's projected retirement time, as described in Figure 3 [16]. The Position Risk Factor depends on the manager's analysis, that takes into account the employee's unique knowledge and skills, in addition to estimating the degree of difficulty or level of effort required to replace the position, as shown in Figure 5 [16]. Thus, multiplying the Dropout Risk Factors by the Position Risk, one arrives at the Total Risk Factor and its meanings (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Risk assessment for critical knowledge loss
It is therefore important to know how many of these employees who retire have the critical knowledge to carry out essential activities for fulfilling the IRD's mission. Factors such as: the time for the employee to leave; the knowledge and technical capacity of the employee; and the availability of replacement personnel with knowledge and skill.
The IRD had 108 higher-level employees, including 28 analysts, 26 researchers and 54 technologists. Of this total, 46 employees have already met the prerequisites for retirement ( Figure   4). The figure 4 also shows the distribution of employees according to work area.
For these 46 employees, a score of 5 was assigned to the Abandonment Risk Factor. At the same time, the Director of the IRD, based on Figure 4, attributed the score to the Position Risk Factor for each of these employees.
Regarding the IRD's final area (technologists and researchers), there is an imminent risk of losing 40% of highly qualified personnel ( Figure 5).

Knowledge Management Assistance Visit (KMAV)
In 2021, the Knowledge Management Assistance Visit (KMAV) was requested from the IAEA.

Maturity Assessment Tool
To assess the level of maturity of KM at IRD, a tool developed by the IAEA was applied [17].
This tool can be found at IAEA TECDOC SERIES 1880. The self-assessment methodology is a tool to help identify strengths and development areas in the organization's overall KM strategy and it has 8 (eight) categories as described below:  This tool was translated and adapted for application in the IRD in partnership with the IAEA. It has been applied in a group of pre-selected servers according to the affinity with each category.
Following the IAEA methodology, each of the eight categories were answered by 10 respondents qualified to carry out the assessment of the aspect being evaluated.
The analysis of the results is based on the difference (∆ Score) found between the current score and the desired score ( Figure 6). This gap can vary from 0 to 5, so that the higher the score, the greater the difference between the current situation and what is desired to be achieved. In this way, the highest scoring categories are those where the greatest KM efforts should be prioritized ( Figure 6). This work reveals two relevant aspects to be addressed as strategic institutional objectives: (a) Human Resource Processes for KM and (b) Knowledge Capture.

Information Technology (IT) and Knowledge Organization Systems (SOC)
On the institutional webpage of IRD (https://www.gov.br/ird/pt-br) it is possible to find information on procedures, documents, forms, works and articles (explicit knowledge).
In addition, it is possible to find on the institutional webpage of IRD on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNTqRGwvdZDU5PaqojsJdSg) interviews and lectures on various subjects related to the area of radiation protection and dosimetry.

Other Activities
Although there is no structured and implemented Mentoring program, some management positions are currently filled by senior professionals and, whenever possible, they work directly with younger employees with high potential for success.
Despite this, in 2021 the first Mentoring project was started, carried out in the Environmental Protection Division. In addition, could be mentioned the publication of papers, addressing the themes of KM, as lessons learned [9], conceptual maps [5], critical knowledge [4,15], and scientific knowledge management [18][19][20].

CONCLUSIONS
It can be said that with these activities, the KM-IRD and some IRD employees could be introduced into available KM tools, serving as a basis for the discussion of the risk analysis of knowledge loss and the transfer of knowledge and inter-organizational networks, among other topics.
Some achievements can be highlighted, such as the implementation of the KM-IRD; carrying out the Maturity Self-Assessment; the preliminary analysis to identify gaps in an organization's KM program/activities; holding Awareness Meetings with Managers; the identification of employees with Critical Knowledge; and the KM Implementation Program is in the final stages of elaboration.
The Level 1 of the visit was very useful to discuss specific issues for the IRD, allowing an exchange of experiences and commitment to the next steps of the process.
The Risk assessment for critical knowledge loss identified 19 technical area employees with high priority risk factors. Fortunately, all these areas are covered by research lines in IRD postgraduation programs, as they can transfer their knowledge during classes. This initiative seems to minimize the effect of loss of knowledge.
The Maturity assessment for KM in the IRD was very helpful to discuss specific issues for the Institute and to guide the development of a knowledge management program for the IRD. The identification of KM practices to benefit and improve existing KM activities to support the organization's objectives is achieved. A study has already been carried out to identify the holders of critical knowledge of the technical areas of the IRD.
The multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary nature of IRD requires the mastery of specific knowledge to achieve the IRD's strategic objectives. In that regard, employees who have critical knowledge are been encouraged to record and disseminate information for the benefit of the institution's long-term sustainability, although it is recognized that tacit knowledge, intrinsic to an activity or process, can be difficult to capture and transmit.
Another major challenge is that the lack of replacement of employees also makes it difficult to find people to whom knowledge can be transferred through mentoring, as well as other KM activities.
In this sense, HR process can be improved by encouraging the use of KM tools to map profiles and The support offered by the top management of the IRD should be highlighted, which has made it possible to carry out activities related to the implementation and effectiveness of KM in the IRD. In general, it can be said that in a culture where knowledge is power, many are still afraid of losing their space and, therefore, may not be concerned about transferring the knowledge acquired through years of work, which ends up making it difficult the KM process a bit.
At a strategic level, actions are being developed to promote a culture of knowledge transfer to future generations of employees, and it is increasingly important that regulatory agencies in their respective countries work with the IAEA through courses, training and meetings to assess the implementation and efficiency of KM programs.
Finally, as for the models used and applied by the IAEA, they are easy to understand, the results are easy to evaluate and free, with all documents available on the IAEA website. As expected, KM tools shows its potential to detect and quantify issues to be addressed and prioritized by institutional decision makers.